3rd May 2007:
23.00
hrs,
OC guest G. McK. approached the McCann’s apartment from the bushes at the rear
of the apartment Mr McCann was looking our over the swimming pool and did not
see Mr McKenzie. Mr McCann was absolutely distraught telling the person
receiving the call that he feared “she had been taken by paedophiles” . He said something along the lines of there
being Paedophile gangs in Portugal and that they had abducted Madeleine. I
was so shocked by this, having originally thought that she had just wandered
off.” unquote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12th May 2007 -Madeleine's fourth
birthday.
Her parents mark the day by calling for
people to redouble their efforts to find her. After spending most of the day
away from Praia da Luz, the couple attend a special birthday mass in the
village where Mr McCann speaks about the impact of the abduction on the family.
He also says for the first time that the
couple are convinced Madeleine is alive.
The total reward being offered by business figures, celebrities and a national newspaper for information leading to Madeleine's safe return reaches £2.5 million.
The total reward being offered by business figures, celebrities and a national newspaper for information leading to Madeleine's safe return reaches £2.5 million.
May 14th May 2007
Mr McCann says that "until there is concrete evidence to the contrary, we believe Madeleine is safe and is being looked after". (mccannfiles.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In view of the the fact that Gerry McCann said within an hour of the disappearance that this was the work of a gang of paedophiles, and has since frequently stated that there is no evidence that she been harmed it is surprising that the images posted below were ever published.
The make-up photo was taken only weeks before their holiday according to reports.
From the snippets collected here we have:
1. Taken by paedophiles - this is one hour after she is found missing and this is a child who often wakes up during the night and walks around the house - so how did GM know?
2. Convinced she is alive - as from the 12th of May.
3. 2.5 million pledged if she is found safe - money coming in for the search- 12th of May onwards
4. Following on from this: Maddie almost definitely alive since evidence to the contrary (a body) not found.
5. Not only alive but being 'looked after' - this started new theories of bereft parents kidnapping a child for themselves - Maddie's 'aliveness' is then rather more credible, in addition her findability has now rocketed to near 100%.
6. And by the 17th/18th May the Fund - the 'Fighting Fund' is operational for a living and findable child even if she has been abducted by a gang of paedophiles. In which case survival would be close to zero.
THIS FUND IS NOT A CHARITY - IT IS A LTD. COMPANY.
The McCanns tell the public that there will be detailed accounts to show the public what they are doing to find Madeleine. The only detailed account is the first one and was analysed by a forensic accountant. It container numberous 'expenses' such as over £ 30.000,-- for the creation of a website.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oprah Winfrey Interview : 4/5/2009 (from Dr. Roberts, McCannfiles.com)
The 'Oprah'
dialogue, for example, exposes an alarming self-contradiction by Kate McCann:Mr McCann says that "until there is concrete evidence to the contrary, we believe Madeleine is safe and is being looked after". (mccannfiles.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In view of the the fact that Gerry McCann said within an hour of the disappearance that this was the work of a gang of paedophiles, and has since frequently stated that there is no evidence that she been harmed it is surprising that the images posted below were ever published.
The make-up photo was taken only weeks before their holiday according to reports.
From the snippets collected here we have:
1. Taken by paedophiles - this is one hour after she is found missing and this is a child who often wakes up during the night and walks around the house - so how did GM know?
2. Convinced she is alive - as from the 12th of May.
3. 2.5 million pledged if she is found safe - money coming in for the search- 12th of May onwards
4. Following on from this: Maddie almost definitely alive since evidence to the contrary (a body) not found.
5. Not only alive but being 'looked after' - this started new theories of bereft parents kidnapping a child for themselves - Maddie's 'aliveness' is then rather more credible, in addition her findability has now rocketed to near 100%.
6. And by the 17th/18th May the Fund - the 'Fighting Fund' is operational for a living and findable child even if she has been abducted by a gang of paedophiles. In which case survival would be close to zero.
THIS FUND IS NOT A CHARITY - IT IS A LTD. COMPANY.
The McCanns tell the public that there will be detailed accounts to show the public what they are doing to find Madeleine. The only detailed account is the first one and was analysed by a forensic accountant. It container numberous 'expenses' such as over £ 30.000,-- for the creation of a website.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oprah Winfrey Interview : 4/5/2009 (from Dr. Roberts, McCannfiles.com)
KM: "...there's no evidence at all to suggest that Madeleine's come to any harm."
Yet later we hear a very curious sentence:
KM: "I mean the last thing I want obviously is to cause any extra further harm to Madeleine..." unquote
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Irish Independent: McCann family reverse story over break-in
'evidence'
By Shane Hickey - Thursday October 25 2007
The spokesman for the family of Madeleine McCann has reversed a statement made in the early days of the search for the missing child.
Speaking to RTE's 'Prime Time', Clarence Mitchell said she could "easily" have been kidnapped by an abductor who did not leave the trail of a break-in. [..] "There was no evidence of a break-in," said Mr Mitchell. unquote
Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns spokesman was interviewed by RTE in early October 2007 In the interview Clarence Mitchell was challenged by the reporter about the McCann's version of events with regards the window being used as an entry or escape route at apartment G5A.
By Shane Hickey - Thursday October 25 2007
The spokesman for the family of Madeleine McCann has reversed a statement made in the early days of the search for the missing child.
Speaking to RTE's 'Prime Time', Clarence Mitchell said she could "easily" have been kidnapped by an abductor who did not leave the trail of a break-in. [..] "There was no evidence of a break-in," said Mr Mitchell. unquote
Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns spokesman was interviewed by RTE in early October 2007 In the interview Clarence Mitchell was challenged by the reporter about the McCann's version of events with regards the window being used as an entry or escape route at apartment G5A.
The question was provoked as it
was now apparent to all through photographic evidence the blinds to the window
of the McCanns apartment had not 'smashed' 'jemmied' or 'broken into' in any
way as had earlier been described. Jill Renwick, a family friend along with
Philomena McCann and Jon Corner and Norah Paul had all publicly insisted that
the blinds had been forced and used as an entry point to the McCanns apartment.
Mitchell's response to the
question was: "There was no evidence of a break-in... but I am not going
to go into the detail. I can tell you off camera, but I am not going to go into
the detail on camera."
unquote
Daily Mail: Maddie plays dressing-up, weeks before she vanished: McCanns fly back to Portugal in bid to reopen case - and release new picture 10:12 PM on 1st May 2010
Kate and Gerry McCann have released a new picture of their daughter Madeleine as they prepare to commemorate tomorrow’s third anniversary of her disappearance.
The photo shows her when she was three after a raid on the dressing-up box – she has a pink bow in her hair and a gold bead necklace and is wearing blue eyeshadow.
It was taken weeks before the fateful family holiday to the Portuguese resort of Praia da Luz when Madeleine vanished. She had been left sleeping with her younger twin siblings, Sean and Amelie, on May 3, 2007.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/madeleine-mccann-a-new-film-to-remind-us-of-her-disappearance-1960386.html
[..] She
is a little girl once more, her eyelids glistening with blue eyeshadow, a pink
ribbon holding her blonde bob in place and a gold necklace hanging from her
neck. Or at least that is how Madeleine McCann appears in a new video released
today to mark a bitter anniversary, as her desperate parents attempt to refocus
the world's attention on their missing daughter.
The still pictures of Madeleine messing around with her mother's make-up and jewelry at her home punctuate a poignant video, shot by a family friend to commemorate the 1,000th day since her disappearance, and which is being made available for all to watch and remember the anguish of those first few painful days. unquote (see photographs below)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suggestive photo-shopped image - arm is disconnected, there is no way the elbow can connect upper and lower arm. Maddie is apparently having an icecream (melting) and an ice lolly at the same time. The make-up photo has been extensively discussed on forums.
The point of this collection of facts is mainly to draw attention to the Freud/Murdoch link. Elizabeth Murdoch and Matthew Freud link to Rebekah Brooks and politicians - all of these have close connections to the McCann case.
The photographs above are merely question marks - how on earth could parents publish these images when they themselves have frequently stated that this 4 - year old was abducted by paedophiles?
As for Freud, he died in 2009, by that time, if not before, it would certainly be known in certain quarters that his sexual preferences weren't exactly legal. Why did it take another 7 years before this came out?
No comments:
Post a Comment